Public Resources Allocation Scheme - Revision history

ScottBot: clean up (AWB)

2007-05-14T17:57:34Z

clean up (AWB)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 14 May 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*[[Perplex City Sentinel]]		*[[Perplex City Sentinel]]
	**		**
	**article, ''01-MAY-70'' "''Earlywine PRAS Initiative Rejected by City Council''" ~~([http://~~www.perplexcitysentinel.com/archives/2007/05/earlywine_suffers.html ~~link])~~		**article, ''01-MAY-70'' "''Earlywine PRAS Initiative Rejected by City Council''" {{WaybackS1\|www.perplexcitysentinel.com/archives/2007/05/earlywine_suffers.html}}

Scott: PRAS moved to Public Resources Allocation Scheme

2007-05-04T18:25:00Z

PRAS moved to Public Resources Allocation Scheme

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:25, 4 May 2007
(No difference)

Quentin at 15:52, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T15:52:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 4 May 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*[[Perplex City Sentinel]]		*[[Perplex City Sentinel]]
	**		**
	**article, ''01-MAY-70'' "''Earlywine PRAS Initiative Rejected by City Council''" ([http://www.perplexcitysentinel.com/archives/''2007/05/earlywine_suffers''.html link])		**article, ''01-MAY-70'' "''Earlywine PRAS Initiative Rejected by City Council''" ([http://www.perplexcitysentinel.com/archives/2007/05/earlywine_suffers.html link])

Quentin at 15:51, 4 May 2007

2007-05-04T15:51:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 4 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==General==		==General==
	PRAS, or Public Resources Allocation Scheme, is a controversial scheme proposed by [[Council]] Leader [[Nathan Earlywine]] to merge all of the government departments of the Greater Perplex City area and surrounds into one centralised authority. They will then be upgraded at an aggregate cost to the taxpayer of 780 billion [[lecks]] (~£39 billion or $78 billion). Critics of the plan, including [[Citizens Watching Government]] say that it will make [[Perplex City]] even less democratic than it is now and cost more to implement than it will save (or, at the least, take a long time to pay off). PRAS was very important in Earlywine's election manifesto back in 269 (2006), and it seems as though many of the citizens of PXC would like to see it go ahead. However, on the 31st of April, 270 (2007), the Council unanimously (presumably excepting Earlywine), voted against it.		PRAS, or Public Resources Allocation Scheme, is a controversial scheme proposed by [[Council]] Leader [[Nathan Earlywine]] to merge all of the government departments of the Greater Perplex City area and surrounds into one centralised authority. They will then be upgraded at an aggregate cost to the taxpayer of 780 billion [[lecks]] (~£39 billion or $78 billion). Critics of the plan, including [[Citizens Watching Government]] say that it will make [[Perplex City]] even less democratic than it is now and cost more to implement than it will save (or, at the least, take a long time to pay off). PRAS was very important in Earlywine's election manifesto back in 269 (2006), and it seems as though many of the citizens of PXC would like to see it go ahead. However, on the 31st of April, 270 (2007), the Council unanimously (presumably excepting Earlywine), voted against it.

			==References==
			*[[Perplex City Sentinel]]
			**
			**article, ''01-MAY-70'' "''Earlywine PRAS Initiative Rejected by City Council''" ([http://www.perplexcitysentinel.com/archives/''2007/05/earlywine_suffers''.html link])

Quentin: New page: {{season2}} ==General== PRAS, or Public Resources Allocation Scheme, is a controversial scheme proposed by Council Leader Nathan Earlywine to merge all of the government department...

2007-05-04T15:45:18Z

New page: {{season2}} ==General== PRAS, or Public Resources Allocation Scheme, is a controversial scheme proposed by Council Leader Nathan Earlywine to merge all of the government department...

New page

{{season2}}
==General==
PRAS, or Public Resources Allocation Scheme, is a controversial scheme proposed by [[Council]] Leader [[Nathan Earlywine]] to merge all of the government departments of the Greater Perplex City area and surrounds into one centralised authority. They will then be upgraded at an aggregate cost to the taxpayer of 780 billion [[lecks]] (~£39 billion or $78 billion). Critics of the plan, including [[Citizens Watching Government]] say that it will make [[Perplex City]] even less democratic than it is now and cost more to implement than it will save (or, at the least, take a long time to pay off). PRAS was very important in Earlywine's election manifesto back in 269 (2006), and it seems as though many of the citizens of PXC would like to see it go ahead. However, on the 31st of April, 270 (2007), the Council unanimously (presumably excepting Earlywine), voted against it.