Talk:Shuffled - Revision history

Edgemaster: /* Solved */

2007-07-30T23:13:26Z

Solved

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 30 July 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Now that this card has been solved, should this page be deleted? [[User:UKver2.0\|UKver2.0]] 12:48, 28 July 2007 (CST)		Now that this card has been solved, should this page be deleted? [[User:UKver2.0\|UKver2.0]] 12:48, 28 July 2007 (CST)
			:No, it is a major part of PXC, the article should be tidied and the final solution and workings laid out clearly here. I do not have the knowledge required to do this yet - catching up after a holiday. --[[User:Edgemaster\|Edgemaster]] 16:13, 30 July 2007 (PDT)

UKver2.0 at 17:48, 28 July 2007

2007-07-28T17:48:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 28 July 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	since it performs both copies in a single step. [[User:Ciphergoth\|Ciphergoth]] 05:40, 3 June 2006 (PDT)		since it performs both copies in a single step. [[User:Ciphergoth\|Ciphergoth]] 05:40, 3 June 2006 (PDT)

			== Solved ==

			Now that this card has been solved, should this page be deleted? [[User:UKver2.0\|UKver2.0]] 12:48, 28 July 2007 (CST)

Xnera: added COTW template

2006-07-05T15:24:09Z

added COTW template

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 5 July 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{COTW}}

	Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP\|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)		Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP\|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Lhall at 16:06, 5 June 2006

2006-06-05T16:06:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 5 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP\|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)		Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP\|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)


			''[[User:Jakeo\|Jakeo]] : I've been creating this page by working through the forum posts. I'm currenly at page: 43. (Hopefully I'm finished, it took 4 hours, and I've read it before!)''

			''Where there is a obvious first post of a new idea I have attempted to credit the author. I may have missed a couple, and its open to interpretation. I do make reference to some of my own posts, but hopefully under the described circumstances. Also, because so much of the information has been duplicated, I have also attempted to keep external information references down to the single, most comprehensive source.''


	== Brute forcing Solitaire ==		== Brute forcing Solitaire ==

Ciphergoth: Brute forcing Solitaire

2006-06-03T12:40:31Z

Brute forcing Solitaire

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 3 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP\|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)		Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP\|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)

			== Brute forcing Solitaire ==

			If you want to brute-force solve Solitaire, I'd be surprised if my C implementation wasn't the fastest:

			:http://www.ciphergoth.org/crypto/solitaire/

			since it performs both copies in a single step. [[User:Ciphergoth\|Ciphergoth]] 05:40, 3 June 2006 (PDT)

GuyP at 23:01, 18 March 2006

2006-03-18T23:01:16Z

New page

Really top-dollar stuff, people! And there I was still assuming we'd need all the playing symbol cards to solve it.,, --[[User:GuyP|GuyP]] 18:01, 18 March 2006 (EST)