Talk:To do - Revision history

Scott: /* WEBSITE ENTRIES */ gone daddy gone! the love is gone!

2005-08-23T05:04:18Z

WEBSITE ENTRIES: gone daddy gone! the love is gone!

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 23 August 2005
Line 64:		Line 64:
	----		----
	----		----


	~~=WEBSITE ENTRIES=~~

	~~[[ascendancypoint.com]]~~
	~~[[mindcandydesign.com]]~~
	~~[[opendesignagency.com]]~~
	~~[[perplexcity.com]]~~
	~~[[perplexcityacademy.com]]~~
	~~[[perplexcitysentinel.com]]~~
	~~[[perplexcitysubway.com]]~~
	~~[[quirkyacuity.com]]~~
	~~[[salkfamily.com]]~~
	~~[[thescarlettkite.com]]~~
	~~[[whipsmartice.com]]~~

	These are all ''(now "Most of)'' the appropriate website entries. most of them are awful. Some don't exist. I'm requesting some fFeedback: Is it actually necesarry to make a wiki entry fFor a webpage fFor a fFeature? http://www.ascendancypoint.com only really talks about the ascendancy point. What could [[ascendancypoint.com]] possibly say that [[Ascendancy Point]] doesn't already? So I ask: do we need pages fFor all websites?

	~~--- [[User:Scott\|Scott]]~~

	~~----~~
	With a lack of fFeedback on this topic, I'm taking the issue into my own hands. I've been updating pages as I go, phasing out references to webpage entries. Eventually, I'd like to delete all these topics entirely. [[User:Scott\|Scott]] 23:35, 4 Aug 2005 (GMT)

Scott at 23:35, 4 August 2005

2005-08-04T23:35:22Z

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 ''added one [[User:Scott|Scott]]''
@@ Line 53: / Line 80: @@
 [[whipsmartice.com]]
-These are all the appropriate website entries.  most of them are awful.  Some don't exist.  I'm requesting some fFeedback:  Is it actually necesarry to make a wiki entry fFor a webpage fFor a fFeature?  http://www.ascendancypoint.com only really talks about the ascendancy point.  What could [[ascendancypoint.com]] possibly say that [[Ascendancy Point]] doesn't already?  So I ask: do we need pages fFor all websites?
+These are all ''(now "Most of)'' the appropriate website entries.  most of them are awful.  Some don't exist.  I'm requesting some fFeedback:  Is it actually necesarry to make a wiki entry fFor a webpage fFor a fFeature?  http://www.ascendancypoint.com only really talks about the ascendancy point.  What could [[ascendancypoint.com]] possibly say that [[Ascendancy Point]] doesn't already?  So I ask: do we need pages fFor all websites?
 --- [[User:Scott|Scott]]

Scott at 21:50, 6 July 2005

2005-07-06T21:50:59Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-===CATEGORIES===
+=CATEGORIES=
 (01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.
-''added one [[User:Scott|Scott]] 22:40, 6 Jul 2005 (BST) ''
+''added one [[User:Scott|Scott]]''

Scott at 21:40, 6 July 2005

2005-07-06T21:40:01Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===CATEGORIES===
 (01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.
@@ Line 37: / Line 13: @@
 *People & Organizations
 **Perplex City Academy
 **Government
 ***Police
@@ Line 58: / Line 35: @@
 These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.

Lhall at 19:08, 5 July 2005

2005-07-05T19:08:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 5 July 2005
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Possible categories:		Possible categories:
	*People		*People & Organizations
	**Perplex City Academy		**Perplex City Academy
	**Government		**Government
Line 42:		Line 42:
	**Athletics		**Athletics
	**Newspaper		**Newspaper
			**Reconstructionists
	*Places		*Places
	**Earth		**Earth
	**Perplex City		**Perplex City
	***all subdivisions		***all subdivisions
	**restaurants, clubs, etc		***restaurants, clubs, etc
	*Things		*Things
			*Puzzles
			**solved
			**unsolved
			**Puzzle Cards
			***organized by color, type, etc.
			*Webpages


			These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.

Lhall at 21:55, 1 July 2005

2005-07-01T21:55:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 1 July 2005
Line 26:		Line 26:
	(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.		(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.

	an example, for a restaurant in Old Town, the categories would read:
			(It'll also really help with the 'To do' stuff, as we can just add or remove a category tag from a page as it's worked on, instead of having to maintain a wiki page for them.)


			For example, for a restaurant in Old Town, the categories would read:
	Perplex City \| Old Town \| Fleet Sreet (or whatever) \| Restaurants		Perplex City \| Old Town \| Fleet Sreet (or whatever) \| Restaurants


	Possible categories:		Possible categories:

Lhall at 21:49, 1 July 2005

2005-07-01T21:49:11Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=THE=
+===THE===
 Here's all the THE titled pages left.
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 in any event ... the ones left on the todo page are mostly ones i'm not sure if they should be left or not.  [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] fFor example.  i cant decide if that should be a proper noun or what.
 =DATES=
 I started changing date fFormats and article fFormats.  the biggest one to do was [[Authors and Their Articles]].  also added a page fFor [[Articles By Date]].  i suggest as articles become available, an item be added to the bottom of the list (in it's proper place) and all references to the same article use the same exact link layout.  that way it'll be preformatted with cross links and all.
 =TIMELINES=
 added one to aiko and recons; recons probably have more to add i'm not thinking of.  should add one to ...?

Scott: /* DATES */ sorry .. wasnt very clear before...

2005-06-15T21:53:25Z

DATES: sorry .. wasnt very clear before...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 15 June 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:

	=DATES=		=DATES=
	I started changing date fFormats and article fFormats. the biggest one to do was [[Authors and Their Articles]]. also added a ~~probably much late in the ocming~~ page fFor [[Articles By Date]]. i suggest an ~~article~~ be added to the bottom of the list (in it's proper place) and all references to the same article use the same exact link layout. that way it'll be preformatted with cross links and all~~. So like i guess at some point i'll start digging thru pages and altering ref-links~~.		I started changing date fFormats and article fFormats. the biggest one to do was [[Authors and Their Articles]]. also added a page fFor [[Articles By Date]]. i suggest as articles become available, an item be added to the bottom of the list (in it's proper place) and all references to the same article use the same exact link layout. that way it'll be preformatted with cross links and all.

	=TIMELINES=		=TIMELINES=
	added one to aiko and recons; recons probably have more to add i'm not thinking of. should add one to ...?		added one to aiko and recons; recons probably have more to add i'm not thinking of. should add one to ...?

Scott at 20:35, 15 June 2005

2005-06-15T20:35:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 15 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=THE=
	Here's all the THE titled pages left.		Here's all the THE titled pages left.

Line 6:		Line 7:

	in any event ... the ones left on the todo page are mostly ones i'm not sure if they should be left or not. [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] fFor example. i cant decide if that should be a proper noun or what.		in any event ... the ones left on the todo page are mostly ones i'm not sure if they should be left or not. [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] fFor example. i cant decide if that should be a proper noun or what.

			=DATES=
			I started changing date fFormats and article fFormats. the biggest one to do was [[Authors and Their Articles]]. also added a probably much late in the ocming page fFor [[Articles By Date]]. i suggest an article be added to the bottom of the list (in it's proper place) and all references to the same article use the same exact link layout. that way it'll be preformatted with cross links and all. So like i guess at some point i'll start digging thru pages and altering ref-links.

			=TIMELINES=
			added one to aiko and recons; recons probably have more to add i'm not thinking of. should add one to ...?

Scott at 18:14, 14 June 2005

2005-06-14T18:14:18Z

New page

Here's all the THE titled pages left.

[[The Anaduna Corridors]] [[The Bell Tower]] [[The Bridge Restaurant]] [[The Brotherhood in the Old Town]] [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] [[The Clock of Marbles]] [[The Cube]] [[The E Thread]] [[The Founder's Gallery]] [[The Great Lawn]] [[The Guardian 21.03.05]] [[The Lab]] [[The Mad Rants Of Tanner]] [[The Maitland Museum]] [[The Majestic Theatre]] [[The Nature Trust]] [[The PCSO]] [[The Receda Cube]] [[The Summer Festival]] [[The Summer Holiday]] [[The Times 23.02.05]] [[The Undercroft Communal Dining Halls]] [[The Unsolved Qi-Qu Puzzle]]

Many in fFact should be left as is, because they are proper nouns. such as "[[The Bridge Restaurant]]". Many should be left because they are handy redirects, such as [[The Cube]]. some of them actually are redics at this time which serve no purpose. such as [[The Undercroft Communal Dining Halls]]. I think it's safe to say we wont see much reference to the dining halls...

in any event ... the ones left on the todo page are mostly ones i'm not sure if they should be left or not. [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] fFor example. i cant decide if that should be a proper noun or what.