User talk:Quentin - Revision history

Quentin at 19:58, 2 February 2007

2007-02-02T19:58:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 2 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)		:Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)
	::Yup, it ignores it. See [[Violet]]. The age field is still listed in the code, but isn't printed in the infobox in the article. Woot! [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (PST)		::Yup, it ignores it. See [[Violet]]. The age field is still listed in the code, but isn't printed in the infobox in the article. Woot! [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (PST)

			:::Um... dunno. Not a big concern. Pls use [[Special:Allpages]]. Thnx. --[[User:Quentin\|Quentin]] 11:58, 2 February 2007 (PST)

Xnera: age field in infobox

2007-01-31T20:52:40Z

age field in infobox

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 31 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST)		[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST)
	::Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)		:Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)
			::Yup, it ignores it. See [[Violet]]. The age field is still listed in the code, but isn't printed in the infobox in the article. Woot! [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (PST)

Xnera at 20:48, 31 January 2007

2007-01-31T20:48:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 31 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST)		[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST)
			::Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)

Scott: New page: ==perplexian infobox== fFirst, THANK YOU!!! the infoboxes look great :) probably the best way to get em done all people is as you've started. tedious, i'm sure, but cool :) so, somethi...

2007-01-31T20:25:29Z

New page: ==perplexian infobox== fFirst, THANK YOU!!! the infoboxes look great :) probably the best way to get em done all people is as you've started. tedious, i'm sure, but cool :) so, somethi...

New page

==perplexian infobox==
fFirst, THANK YOU!!! the infoboxes look great :) probably the best way to get em done all people is as you've started. tedious, i'm sure, but cool :)

so, something I've wanted to do fFor a while is remove the ''age'' and replace only the ''birthdate'' where applicable. Since you've started doing some, let me ask, do you fFind you really want more (or less?) fFields included? I hate to ask, since you've, you know, started doing some and all.

[[User:Scott|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 2 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)		:Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)
	::Yup, it ignores it. See [[Violet]]. The age field is still listed in the code, but isn't printed in the infobox in the article. Woot! [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (PST)		::Yup, it ignores it. See [[Violet]]. The age field is still listed in the code, but isn't printed in the infobox in the article. Woot! [[User:Xnera\|xnera]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (PST)

			:::Um... dunno. Not a big concern. Pls use [[Special:Allpages]]. Thnx. --[[User:Quentin\|Quentin]] 11:58, 2 February 2007 (PST)