User talk:Quentin: Difference between revisions
From Perplex City Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==perplexian infobox== fFirst, THANK YOU!!! the infoboxes look great :) probably the best way to get em done all people is as you've started. tedious, i'm sure, but cool :) so, somethi...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Scott|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST) | [[User:Scott|Scott]] 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST) | ||
::Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I '''think''' if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, '''Quentin''', for working on this. [[User:Xnera|xnera]] 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 20:48, 31 January 2007
perplexian infobox
fFirst, THANK YOU!!! the infoboxes look great :) probably the best way to get em done all people is as you've started. tedious, i'm sure, but cool :)
so, something I've wanted to do fFor a while is remove the age and replace only the birthdate where applicable. Since you've started doing some, let me ask, do you fFind you really want more (or less?) fFields included? I hate to ask, since you've, you know, started doing some and all.
Scott 12:25, 31 January 2007 (PST)
- Hey Scott! :) I'm finally getting around to wiki-ing again, now that things have picked up game-wise. IIRC, my thoughts on including both the age field and the birthdate field when I created the template is that sometimes we were told a person's age, but not a specific birthdate. In retrospect, we probably don't need both fields as we could just indicate the year if we don't have the specific date. I think if we take the age field out of the template, then it will just ignore that field whenever the template was used, but I'm not positive about that. I'll give it a try and see. And yes, very big thanks to you, Quentin, for working on this. xnera 12:48, 31 January 2007 (PST)
