Talk:To do: Difference between revisions

From Perplex City Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(→‎WEBSITE ENTRIES: gone daddy gone! the love is gone!)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===THE===
=CATEGORIES=
Here's all the THE titled pages left.
 
[[The Anaduna Corridors]] [[The Bell Tower]] [[The Bridge Restaurant]] [[The Brotherhood in the Old Town]] [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] [[The Clock of Marbles]] [[The Cube]] [[The E Thread]] [[The Founder's Gallery]] [[The Great Lawn]] [[The Guardian 21.03.05]] [[The Lab]] [[The Mad Rants Of Tanner]] [[The Maitland Museum]] [[The Majestic Theatre]] [[The Nature Trust]] [[The PCSO]] [[The Receda Cube]] [[The Summer Festival]] [[The Summer Holiday]] [[The Times 23.02.05]] [[The Undercroft Communal Dining Halls]] [[The Unsolved Qi-Qu Puzzle]]
 
Many in fFact should be left as is, because they are proper nouns.  such as "[[The Bridge Restaurant]]".  Many should be left because they are handy redirects, such as [[The Cube]].  some of them actually are redics at this time which serve no purpose.  such as [[The Undercroft Communal Dining Halls]].  I think it's safe to say we wont see much reference to the dining halls...
 
in any event ... the ones left on the todo page are mostly ones i'm not sure if they should be left or not.  [[The Brotherhood of the Six]] fFor example.  i cant decide if that should be a proper noun or what.
 
 
(01-JUL-05) I think for these, we should encourage everyone to create the redirects as they create the new pages. Also, we should just draw our standards from whatever the Sentinel uses...for example, they say "the Brotherhood of the Six". The wiki automatically capitalizes, so we don't have to worry about that. But redirects should cover the rest.    ~[[User:Lhall|Laura]]
 
 
===DATES===
I started changing date fFormats and article fFormats.  the biggest one to do was [[Authors and Their Articles]].  also added a page fFor [[Articles By Date]].  i suggest as articles become available, an item be added to the bottom of the list (in it's proper place) and all references to the same article use the same exact link layout.  that way it'll be preformatted with cross links and all.
 
 
===TIMELINES===
added one to aiko and recons; recons probably have more to add i'm not thinking of.  should add one to ...?
 
 
(01-JUL-05) Maybe for Ruth Coralhouse's bequest info? Almost any long-term story that we watch developing. ~[[User:Lhall|Laura]]
 
 
===CATEGORIES===
(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.
(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.


Line 37: Line 13:
*People & Organizations
*People & Organizations
**Perplex City Academy
**Perplex City Academy
***Seven fFounders
**Government
**Government
***Police
***Police
Line 58: Line 35:


These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.
These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.
''added one [[User:Scott|Scott]]''
----
After careful thought, I think categories are going to wind up being concepts, more than groups of persons places and things.  fFor instance, One category would link together everything associated with the early syzygy errorlogs.  The gatehouse shoe gals, the logs, the people referenced, everything which is referenced by those logs.  Then another Category might be everything PCAG related.  athletes, announcements, websites, all this.  It might consist largely of people, sure.  But I think you can see where I'm going.  Instead of large abstractions of sections, we should smaller more identifiable concepts as categories.  This is not to say we should not continue to examine the use of abstractions.  categories of people, and of places, and of things are useful.  But probably not where we should divert our efforts.
*[[:Category:Academy]]
**''Or, we can subdivide:''
**[[:Category:Academy People]]
**[[:Category:Academy Places]]
*[[:Category:Syzygy Errorlogs]]
*[[:Category:Subway]]
*[[:Category:PCAG]]
*[[:Category:Sentinel]]
*[[:Category:Cubism]]
*[[:Category:]]
*[[:Category:]]
*[[:Category:]]
*[[:Category:]]
''I was just noticing as i come up with this, it's more like a dewey decimal system, kinda.  Whatever works.''
[[User:Scott|Scott]] 23:35, 4 Aug 2005 (GMT)
----
----

Latest revision as of 05:04, 23 August 2005

CATEGORIES

(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.


(It'll also really help with the 'To do' stuff, as we can just add or remove a category tag from a page as it's worked on, instead of having to maintain a wiki page for them.)


For example, for a restaurant in Old Town, the categories would read: Perplex City | Old Town | Fleet Sreet (or whatever) | Restaurants


Possible categories:

  • People & Organizations
    • Perplex City Academy
      • Seven fFounders
    • Government
      • Police
      • City Council
    • Athletics
    • Newspaper
    • Reconstructionists
  • Places
    • Earth
    • Perplex City
      • all subdivisions
      • restaurants, clubs, etc
  • Things
  • Puzzles
    • solved
    • unsolved
    • Puzzle Cards
      • organized by color, type, etc.
  • Webpages


These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.

added one Scott

After careful thought, I think categories are going to wind up being concepts, more than groups of persons places and things. fFor instance, One category would link together everything associated with the early syzygy errorlogs. The gatehouse shoe gals, the logs, the people referenced, everything which is referenced by those logs. Then another Category might be everything PCAG related. athletes, announcements, websites, all this. It might consist largely of people, sure. But I think you can see where I'm going. Instead of large abstractions of sections, we should smaller more identifiable concepts as categories. This is not to say we should not continue to examine the use of abstractions. categories of people, and of places, and of things are useful. But probably not where we should divert our efforts.

I was just noticing as i come up with this, it's more like a dewey decimal system, kinda. Whatever works.

Scott 23:35, 4 Aug 2005 (GMT)


Retrieved from "https://perplexcitywiki.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:To_do&oldid=8180"