Talk:To do: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=CATEGORIES= | |||
(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting. | (01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out. | These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out. | ||
''added one [[User:Scott|Scott]] | ''added one [[User:Scott|Scott]]'' | ||
=WEBSITE ENTRIES= | |||
[[ascendancypoint.com]] | |||
[[mindcandydesign.com]] | |||
[[opendesignagency.com]] | |||
[[perplexcity.com]] | |||
[[perplexcityacademy.com]] | |||
[[perplexcitysentinel.com]] | |||
[[perplexcitysubway.com]] | |||
[[quirkyacuity.com]] | |||
[[salkfamily.com]] | |||
[[thescarlettkite.com]] | |||
[[whipsmartice.com]] | |||
These are all the appropriate website entries. most of them are awful. Some don't exist. I'm requesting some fFeedback: Is it actually necesarry to make a wiki entry fFor a webpage fFor a fFeature? http://www.ascendancypoint.com only really talks about the ascendancy point. What could [[ascendancypoint.com]] possibly say that [[Ascendancy Point]] doesn't already? So I ask: do we need pages fFor all websites? | |||
--- [[User:Scott|Scott]] | |||
Revision as of 21:50, 6 July 2005
CATEGORIES
(01-JUL-05) One thing I'd like to consider is categories, but I'd like to lay out a basic structure before we actually started sorting.
(It'll also really help with the 'To do' stuff, as we can just add or remove a category tag from a page as it's worked on, instead of having to maintain a wiki page for them.)
For example, for a restaurant in Old Town, the categories would read:
Perplex City | Old Town | Fleet Sreet (or whatever) | Restaurants
Possible categories:
- People & Organizations
- Perplex City Academy
- Seven fFounders
- Government
- Police
- City Council
- Athletics
- Newspaper
- Reconstructionists
- Perplex City Academy
- Places
- Earth
- Perplex City
- all subdivisions
- restaurants, clubs, etc
- Things
- Puzzles
- solved
- unsolved
- Puzzle Cards
- organized by color, type, etc.
- Webpages
These seem to cover it generally, so please add anything you feel has been left out.
added one Scott
WEBSITE ENTRIES
ascendancypoint.com mindcandydesign.com opendesignagency.com perplexcity.com perplexcityacademy.com perplexcitysentinel.com perplexcitysubway.com quirkyacuity.com salkfamily.com thescarlettkite.com whipsmartice.com
These are all the appropriate website entries. most of them are awful. Some don't exist. I'm requesting some fFeedback: Is it actually necesarry to make a wiki entry fFor a webpage fFor a fFeature? http://www.ascendancypoint.com only really talks about the ascendancy point. What could ascendancypoint.com possibly say that Ascendancy Point doesn't already? So I ask: do we need pages fFor all websites?
--- Scott
