Emails To and From O6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==General Information== | |||
This is a set of conversations discovered in emails bewteeen members of [[The Third Power]] on Earth. Further information on this topic can be seen at the article: [[3PGroupwareManager]]. | |||
==Checking In== | ==Checking In== | ||
<code> | <code> |
Revision as of 02:43, 25 October 2005
General Information
This is a set of conversations discovered in emails bewteeen members of The Third Power on Earth. Further information on this topic can be seen at the article: 3PGroupwareManager.
Checking In
Date: 5 October 2005 3:34am
From: O6
To: O1
Subject: Moscow ready
Checking and and waiting for orders
Stand By (mass)
Date: 18 October 2005 3:29pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Standby
Those of you with uncompleted assignments, please provide me with regular status reports. While we wait for the situation to clarify, please reserve these channels for official use only.
V.
Date: 18 October 2005 10:55am
From: O8
To: O6
Subject: Geek questions!!
I've got kind of an emergency problem over here and I need your help on it. Contact me as soon as you get in and I'll zip you the details, okay?
Thanks, dude.
Status
Date: 18 October 2005 10:07am
From: V
To: O6
Subject: Status request
How is your assignment progressing? Do you think it will work?
V.
Date: 18 October 2005 10:15am
From: O6
To: V
Subject: Status request
Will it work? Undoubtedly! Will it proceed to raze everything within a 12-block radius? Quite possible. You don't anticipate that will be a problem, do you?
Date: 18 October 2005 10:19am
From: V
To: O6
Subject: Status request
Well that all depends on the circumstances under which we're forced to use it. My main concern is that it will keep the package safe.
V.
Date: 18 October 2005 10:21am
From: O6
To: V
Subject: Status request
Sure, at the expense of everything else in close proximity. But the package, as you well know, is a block of an entirely different mettle, in a manner of speaking. I'm certain IT won't be harmed, anyway. And that's a sort of protection after all, isn't it?
Date: 18 October 2005 10:24am
From: V
To: O6
Subject: Status request
You're talking last ditch when I need top drawer. Let us aim for perfection, so that we may approach it more nearly.
V.
Date: 18 October 2005 10:38am
From: O6
To: V
Subject: Status request
Fine. Trust me. It will be ready and up to spec by the time you have need of it.
Successful Completion (mass)
Date: 12 October 2005 2:46pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
Both unstable links in the chain have been eliminated. We were fortunate in several respects. It is vital that no other mistakes are made. Contact between operatives is only to be through established channels.
V.
Date: 12 October 2005 3:51pm
From: O3
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
What about the fourth member of the original group?
Date: 12 October 2005 7:42pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
For the time being, she poses no threat.
Date: 12 October 2005 7:48pm
From: O6
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
I would favour a thorough eradication operation.
Date: 12 October 2005 7:49pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
I am unconvinced that the risk of exposure would be worth the gain in security.
V.
Date: 13 October 2005 2:05am
From: O6
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
The very existence of the fourth member constitutes a risk of exposure. The behaviour of K and Q confirm this. I suggest immediate elimination.
Date: 13 October 2005 2:28am
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion
You presume too much on your position. She will be eliminated as soon as practical. I will determine when that point is reached.
V.