Emails To and From O6: Difference between revisions

From Perplex City Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(sorted)
Line 15: Line 15:




==Geek Question==
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="Plum"
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:55am<br>
From: O8<br>
To: O6<br>
Subject: Geek questions!!


I've got kind of an emergency problem over here and I need your help on it. Contact me as soon as you get in and I'll zip you the details, okay?
==Successful Completion (mass)==
 
Thanks, dude.
|}
 
 
==Status==
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:07am<br>
Date: 12 October 2005 2:46pm<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: O6<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Status request
Subject: Successful completion


How is your assignment progressing? Do you think it will work?
Both unstable links in the chain have been eliminated. We were fortunate in several respects. It is vital that no other mistakes are made. Contact between operatives is only to be through established channels.


V.
V.
|}
|}


{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="Yellow"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:15am<br>
Date: 12 October 2005 3:51pm<br>
From: O6<br>
From: O3<br>
To: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Status request
Subject: Successful completion


Will it work? Undoubtedly! Will it proceed to raze everything within a 12-block radius? Quite possible. You don't anticipate that will be a problem, do you?
What about the fourth member of the original group?
|}
|}


{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:19am<br>
Date: 12 October 2005 7:42pm<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: O6<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Status request
Subject: Successful completion


Well that all depends on the circumstances under which we're forced to use it. My main concern is that it will keep the package safe.
For the time being, she poses no threat.
 
V.
|}
|}


{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:21am<br>
Date: 12 October 2005 7:48pm<br>
From: O6<br>
From: O6<br>
To: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Status request
Subject: Successful completion


Sure, at the expense of everything else in close proximity. But the package, as you well know, is a block of an entirely different mettle, in a manner of speaking. I'm certain IT won't be harmed, anyway. And that's a sort of protection after all, isn't it?
I would favour a thorough eradication operation.
|}
|}


{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:24am<br>
Date: 12 October 2005 7:49pm<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: O6<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Status request
Subject: Successful completion


You're talking last ditch when I need top drawer. Let us aim for perfection, so that we may approach it more nearly.
I am unconvinced that the risk of exposure would be worth the gain in security.


V.
V.
Line 88: Line 73:
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:38am<br>
Date: 13 October 2005 2:05am<br>
From: O6<br>
From: O6<br>
To: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Status request
Subject: Successful completion


Fine. Trust me. It will be ready and up to spec by the time you have need of it.
The very existence of the fourth member constitutes a risk of exposure. The behaviour of K and Q confirm this. I suggest immediate elimination.
|}
|}


==Stand By (mass)==
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 18 October 2005 3:29pm<br>
Date: 13 October 2005 2:28am<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Standby
Subject: Successful completion


Those of you with uncompleted assignments, please provide me with regular status reports. While we wait for the situation to clarify, please reserve these channels for official use only.
You presume too much on your position. She will be eliminated as soon as practical. I will determine when that point is reached.


V.
V.
Line 112: Line 94:




==Successful Completion (mass)==
 
==Status==
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 12 October 2005 2:46pm<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 10:07am<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: O6<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Status request


Both unstable links in the chain have been eliminated. We were fortunate in several respects. It is vital that no other mistakes are made. Contact between operatives is only to be through established channels.
How is your assignment progressing? Do you think it will work?


V.
V.
|}
|}


{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="Yellow"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
|
|
Date: 12 October 2005 3:51pm<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 10:15am<br>
From: O3<br>
From: O6<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: V<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Status request


What about the fourth member of the original group?
Will it work? Undoubtedly! Will it proceed to raze everything within a 12-block radius? Quite possible. You don't anticipate that will be a problem, do you?
|}
|}


{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 12 October 2005 7:42pm<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 10:19am<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: O6<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Status request
 
Well that all depends on the circumstances under which we're forced to use it. My main concern is that it will keep the package safe.


For the time being, she poses no threat.
V.
|}
|}


{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
|
|
Date: 12 October 2005 7:48pm<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 10:21am<br>
From: O6<br>
From: O6<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: V<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Status request


I would favour a thorough eradication operation.
Sure, at the expense of everything else in close proximity. But the package, as you well know, is a block of an entirely different mettle, in a manner of speaking. I'm certain IT won't be harmed, anyway. And that's a sort of protection after all, isn't it?
|}
|}


{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 12 October 2005 7:49pm<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 10:24am<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: O6<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Status request


I am unconvinced that the risk of exposure would be worth the gain in security.
You're talking last ditch when I need top drawer. Let us aim for perfection, so that we may approach it more nearly.


V.
V.
Line 169: Line 154:
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="LightBlue"
|
|
Date: 13 October 2005 2:05am<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 10:38am<br>
From: O6<br>
From: O6<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: V<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Status request
 
Fine. Trust me. It will be ready and up to spec by the time you have need of it.
|}
 
 
 
==Geek Question==
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="Plum"
|
Date: 18 October 2005 10:55am<br>
From: O8<br>
To: O6<br>
Subject: Geek questions!!
 
I've got kind of an emergency problem over here and I need your help on it. Contact me as soon as you get in and I'll zip you the details, okay?


The very existence of the fourth member constitutes a risk of exposure. The behaviour of K and Q confirm this. I suggest immediate elimination.
Thanks, dude.
|}
|}


==Stand By (mass)==
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
{| border="1" cellpadding="10" width="70%" bgcolor="White"
|
|
Date: 13 October 2005 2:28am<br>
Date: 18 October 2005 3:29pm<br>
From: V<br>
From: V<br>
To: All operatives<br>
To: All operatives<br>
Subject: Successful completion
Subject: Standby


You presume too much on your position. She will be eliminated as soon as practical. I will determine when that point is reached.
Those of you with uncompleted assignments, please provide me with regular status reports. While we wait for the situation to clarify, please reserve these channels for official use only.


V.
V.
|}
|}

Revision as of 03:54, 25 October 2005

General Information

This is a set of conversations discovered in emails bewteeen members of The Third Power on Earth. Further information on this topic can be seen at the article: 3PGroupwareManager.


Checking In

Date: 5 October 2005 3:34am
From: O6
To: O1
Subject: Moscow ready

Checking and and waiting for orders


Successful Completion (mass)

Date: 12 October 2005 2:46pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

Both unstable links in the chain have been eliminated. We were fortunate in several respects. It is vital that no other mistakes are made. Contact between operatives is only to be through established channels.

V.

Date: 12 October 2005 3:51pm
From: O3
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

What about the fourth member of the original group?

Date: 12 October 2005 7:42pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

For the time being, she poses no threat.

Date: 12 October 2005 7:48pm
From: O6
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

I would favour a thorough eradication operation.

Date: 12 October 2005 7:49pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

I am unconvinced that the risk of exposure would be worth the gain in security.

V.

Date: 13 October 2005 2:05am
From: O6
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

The very existence of the fourth member constitutes a risk of exposure. The behaviour of K and Q confirm this. I suggest immediate elimination.

Date: 13 October 2005 2:28am
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Successful completion

You presume too much on your position. She will be eliminated as soon as practical. I will determine when that point is reached.

V.


Status

Date: 18 October 2005 10:07am
From: V
To: O6
Subject: Status request

How is your assignment progressing? Do you think it will work?

V.

Date: 18 October 2005 10:15am
From: O6
To: V
Subject: Status request

Will it work? Undoubtedly! Will it proceed to raze everything within a 12-block radius? Quite possible. You don't anticipate that will be a problem, do you?

Date: 18 October 2005 10:19am
From: V
To: O6
Subject: Status request

Well that all depends on the circumstances under which we're forced to use it. My main concern is that it will keep the package safe.

V.

Date: 18 October 2005 10:21am
From: O6
To: V
Subject: Status request

Sure, at the expense of everything else in close proximity. But the package, as you well know, is a block of an entirely different mettle, in a manner of speaking. I'm certain IT won't be harmed, anyway. And that's a sort of protection after all, isn't it?

Date: 18 October 2005 10:24am
From: V
To: O6
Subject: Status request

You're talking last ditch when I need top drawer. Let us aim for perfection, so that we may approach it more nearly.

V.

Date: 18 October 2005 10:38am
From: O6
To: V
Subject: Status request

Fine. Trust me. It will be ready and up to spec by the time you have need of it.


Geek Question

Date: 18 October 2005 10:55am
From: O8
To: O6
Subject: Geek questions!!

I've got kind of an emergency problem over here and I need your help on it. Contact me as soon as you get in and I'll zip you the details, okay?

Thanks, dude.


Stand By (mass)

Date: 18 October 2005 3:29pm
From: V
To: All operatives
Subject: Standby

Those of you with uncompleted assignments, please provide me with regular status reports. While we wait for the situation to clarify, please reserve these channels for official use only.

V.