Citizens Watching Government: Difference between revisions
From Perplex City Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(clean up (AWB)) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
*'''The Perplex City Sentine''' | *'''The Perplex City Sentine''' | ||
**article, 01-MAY-07 "[[Earlywine]] [[PRAS Initiative]] Rejected by [[City Council]]" | **article, 01-MAY-07 "[[Earlywine]] [[PRAS Initiative]] Rejected by [[City Council]]" {{WaybackS1|www.perplexcitysentinel.com/archives/2007/05/earlywine_suffers.html}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:27, 11 May 2007
General
- Opponents of the PRAS
- saying the centralisation plan would cost more money to implement than it would save.
- unfair allocation of resources
- improper sharing of information between governmental offices
- a frustrating increase in layers of bureaucracy
|
"The government has grown up with these separate offices and agencies for a reason. Throwing away all of these distinctions without a second thought, just for the sake of saving a few lecks -- that's practically criminal." |
|
The Sentinel - 01/05/270 - CWG Lodges Complaint Civil rights group Citizens Watching Government has filed a formal complaint against the city, seeking compensation for the "reckless imprisonment" of 84 people in the Missing Piece murder case in March. |
References
- The Perplex City Sentine
- article, 01-MAY-07 "Earlywine PRAS Initiative Rejected by City Council" link
