Charlotte Fanning: Difference between revisions

From Perplex City Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==General==
==General==
*Is known to enjoy the company of other women.
**This is, of course, not in any way a social stigma.
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" style="border: 2px solid #ddddff;" bgcolor="#f3f3ff"
{| border="0" cellpadding="10" width="70%" style="border: 2px solid #ddddff;" bgcolor="#f3f3ff"
|
|
Line 12: Line 9:


==Reference==
==Reference==
**letters, 19-JAN-06 "Sexual Politics" ([http://qube.netninja.com/pxcmirrors/20050122-0700/perplexcitysentinel.com/letters/index.html link])
*letters, 19-JAN-06 "Sexual Politics" ([http://qube.netninja.com/pxcmirrors/20060122-0700/perplexcitysentinel.com/letters/index.html link])

Revision as of 07:47, 5 February 2006

General

When I read the View from Earth column 'Sexual Politics' last week, I was horrified at the Earth-centric base assumptions the author made. Unlike on Earth, where artificial categories of people are by turn oppressed and defended, we have no such bizarre subdividing in Perplex City. We have many notable men in the city who love men, and many notable women who love women, as well; but why is this placing of affection something that needs to be separated and defended? I know that I have never been attacked or snubbed because of my own relationships with women. What next, will we be scolded for not vigilantly defending the rights of people who have green eyes?

Charlotte Fanning


Reference

  • letters, 19-JAN-06 "Sexual Politics" (link)